# Einstein Relatively Easy

### What's Up If you like this content, you can help maintaining this website with a small tip on my tipeee page In our previous article Local Flatness or Local Inertial Frames and SpaceTime curvature, we have come to the conclusion that in a curved spacetime, it was impossible to find a frame for which all of the second derivatives of the metric tensor could be null.

We have also mentionned the name of the most important tensor in General Relativity, i.e. the tensor in which all this curvature information is embedded: the Riemann tensor  - named after the nineteenth-century German mathematician Bernhard Riemann - or curvature tensor. In other words, the vanishing of the Riemann tensor is both a necessary and sufficient condition for Euclidean - flat -  space.

In this article, our aim is to try to derive its exact expression from the concept of parallel transport of vectors/tensors.

##### Parallel transport

Say you start at the north pole holding a javelin that points horizontally in some direction, and you carry the javelin to the equator, always keeping the javelin pointing "in as same a direction as possible", subject to the constraint that it point horizontally, i.e., tangent to the earth. (The idea is that we're taking "space" to be the 2-dimensional surface of the earth, and the javelin is the "little arrow" or "tangent vector", which must remain tangent to "space".)

After marching down to the equator, march 90 degrees around the equator, and then march back up to the north pole, always keeping the javelin pointing horizontally and "in as same a direction as possible" along the meridian.

By the time you get back to the north pole, the javelin is pointing a different direction! That's because the surface of the earth is curved. In fact, if we parallel transport a vector around an infinitesimal loop on a manifold, the vector we end up wih will only be equal to the vector we started with if the manifold is flat.

Actually, "parallel transport" has a very precise definition in curved space: it is defined as transport for which the covariant derivative - as defined previously in Introduction to Covariant Differentiation - is zero.

So holding the covariant at zero while transporting a vector around a small loop is one way to derive the Riemann tensor.

But there is also another more indirect way using what is called the commutator of the covariant derivative of a vector.

##### Covariant derivative commutator

In this usage, "commutator" refers to the difference that results from performing two operations first in one order and then in the reverse order. So if one operator is denoted by A and another is denoted by B, the commutator is defined as [AB] = AB - BA. Thus if the sequence of the two operations has no impact on the result, the commutator has a value of zero.

To get the Riemann tensor, the operation of choice is covariant derivative.  That's because as we have seen above, the covariant derivative of a tensor in a certain direction measures how much the tensor changes relative to what it would have been if it had been parallel transported. The commutator of two covariant derivatives, then, measures the difference between parallel transporting the tensor first one way and then the other, versus the opposite.

In flat space the order of covariant differentiation makes no difference - as covariant differentiation reduces to partial differentiation -, so the commutator must yield zero. Inversely, any non-zero result of applying the commutator to covariant differentiation can therefore be attributed to the curvature of the space, and therefore to the Riemann tensor.

##### Derivation of the Riemann tensor

So, our aim is to derive the Riemann tensor by finding the commutator or, in semi-colon notation, We know that the covariant derivative of Va is given by Also,  taking the covariant derivative of this expression, which is a tensor of rank 2 we get: Considering the first right-hand side term, we get: Then using the product rule Considering now the second and third right-hand terms, we can write: Putting all these terms together, we find equation (A) Now interchanging b and c gives equation (B) Substracting (A) - (B), the first term and last term compensate each other (we remember that the Christoffel symbol is symmetric relative to the lower indices) therefore we end up with the following remaining terms Multiplying out the brackets in the last terms and factorizing out the terms with Vd But by the definition of the Christoffel symbol as explained in the article Christoffel Symbol or Connection coefficient, we know that Therefore And by swapping dummy indexes μ and ν we have obviously Finally the expression of the covariant derivative commutator is We define the expression inside the brackets on the right-hand side to be the Riemann tensor, meaning Remark 1: The curvature tensor measures noncommutativity of the covariant derivative as those commute only if the Riemann tensor is null.

Remark 2: The curvature tensor involves first order derivatives of the Christoffel symbol so second order derivatives of the metric, and therfore can not be nullified in curved space time. We recalll from our article Local Flatness or Local Inertial Frames and SpaceTime curvature that if the surface is curved, we can not find a frame for which all of the second derivatives of the metric could be null.

Remark 3: Having four indices, in n-dimensions the Riemann curvature tensor has n4 components, i.e 24 = 16 in two-dimensional space, 34=81 in three dimensions and 44=256 in four dimensions (as in spacetime).

### Quotes

"The essence of my theory is precisely that no independent properties are attributed to space on its own. It can be put jokingly this way. If I allow all things to vanish from the world, then following Newton, the Galilean inertial space remains; following my interpretation, however, nothing remains.."
Letter from A.Einstein to Karl Schwarzschild - Berlin, 9 January 1916

"Quantum mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The theory says a lot, but does not really bring us any closer to the secret of the 'old one'. I, at any rate, am convinced that He is not playing at dice."
Einstein to Max Born, letter 52, 4th december 1926