# Einstein Relatively Easy

### What's Up If you like this content, you can help maintaining this website with a small tip on my tipeee page In this article, we will calculate the Euclidian metric tensor for a surface of a sphere in spherical coordinates by two ways, as seen in the previous article Generalisation of the metric tensor

• - By deducing the metric directly from the space line element
• - By calculating the metric from the product of derivatives of the two-dimensional Cartesian coordinates system Spherical coordinates (r, θ, φ) as commonly used in physics: radial distance r, polar angle θ (theta), and azimuthal angle φ (phi). Source Wikipedia

#### Deducing the metric by the line element

In this Euclidian three-dimensionnal space, the line element is given by:

dl2 = dr2 + r22 + r2sin2θdΦ2

If we set the polar coordinate r to be some constant R we lose the dr term (because r is now constant) and the line element now becomes:

dl2 = R22 + R2sin2θdΦ2

which describes a two-dimensional surface using the two polar coordinates (θ, Φ)

Or we know from the previous article that this line element could be written as:

dl2 = gijdxidyj

We can deduce immediately that the metric and inverse metric for this surface, using coordinates x0=θ and x1=Φ, are: This was the easy part. Let's try to calculate the same metric by using  the formula of the coordinates derivatives product.

#### Calculating the metric by the Cartesian  coordinates derivatives product

We should recall that we also defined the metric tensor as the product of derivatives to another coordinate system (in the previous article, it was from a Minkowski inertial referential) Or the cartesian coordinates and spherical coordinates are linked together by the following equations:   At this point we can confirm that by both the space  line element and the product of coordinates derivatives, we have found exactly the same components for the metric of a two-dimensional surface of a sphere in polar coordinates ### Quotes

"The essence of my theory is precisely that no independent properties are attributed to space on its own. It can be put jokingly this way. If I allow all things to vanish from the world, then following Newton, the Galilean inertial space remains; following my interpretation, however, nothing remains.."
Letter from A.Einstein to Karl Schwarzschild - Berlin, 9 January 1916

"Quantum mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The theory says a lot, but does not really bring us any closer to the secret of the 'old one'. I, at any rate, am convinced that He is not playing at dice."
Einstein to Max Born, letter 52, 4th december 1926